All BCCM News

March 2, 2020
The Essential Value of Forming TSCA Consortia

Today as never before, the old adage “there is strength in numbers” rings true. As the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to implement the amended Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), industry stakeholders are recognizing the immense importance of working within consortia to leverage resources, reduce cost, and increase opportunities for successful results. EPA statements in connection with TSCA implementation have repeatedly reinforced its expectation that industry will work collaboratively and efficiently in consortia in supporting the TSCA Section 6 risk evaluation process for the 20 high-priority chemical substances undergoing evaluation. EPA’s policies for consortia-backed testing under TSCA Section 4 reflect EPA’s belief that when confronted with requirements that are best addressed through shared effort, companies subject to TSCA test rules will opt to work together to complete the testing.

Industry stakeholders are scrambling to understand the obligations for self-identification in response to EPA’s January 27, 2020, notice identifying the “preliminary lists” of manufacturers (including importers) of the 20 chemical substances that EPA designated as high-priority for risk evaluation for which fees will be charged. See B&C’s February 26, 2020, memorandum on EPA’s February 24, 2020, webinar on the application of the TSCA fees rule to the 20 high-priority chemical substances.

This ongoing effort, and recognition that this process will repeat itself when the next round of chemicals are identified for prioritization, crystalizes the urgent need to form consortia for chemicals of commercial interest now.

The Time to Act Is Now

There is no time like the present. While your chemicals of interest may not be on EPA’s current high-priority list, we know that EPA will be looking to the TSCA Work Plan for future prioritization candidate chemicals. In our view, any chemical on the Work Plan list should have a consortium set up now. Even if your chemical is not on the Work Plan list, it would still be prudent to consider establishing an industry group if one is not already set.

Company representatives looking to form industry groups for chemicals of commercial interest should know that organizing an effective industry consortium takes much more than pulling together a membership roster and e-mail list. We know, as B&C® Consortia Management (BCCM) has been forming and managing chemical consortia for many years. BCCM is now deeply engaged in TSCA chemical consortia and well versed in both consortia management and the law, policy, and science of TSCA and the risk evaluation process. Newly formed groups will need to know TSCA and the legal landscape for antitrust and Federal tax requirements and implement those requirements properly. They must recognize the many challenges in setting up bank accounts that will be used to collect and distribute large sums of money. This work can be particularly tricky if there are non-U.S. companies involved.

A new consortium may need assistance in negotiating reasonable and fair cost allocation strategies among its diverse members, many of which could be of varying sizes and commercial interests. There may be a need for assistance to address what might be a large learning curve in understanding the underlying science of an EPA evaluation or in the development of a testing protocol. And of course, a new consortium must be able to establish and maintain excellent working relationships with EPA staff and leadership and with other stakeholders. Building off the B&C decision tree from the February 26, 2020, memorandum on how to respond to EPA’s January 27, 2020, notice, we also provide a follow-up decision tree that companies should use as they consider consortia management needs; additional resources are available below the graphic

Click image to enlarge or download PDF.

Why BCCM Is an Unbeatable Choice

BCCM’s unique and decades-long experience is without equal. Our gifted staff has years of experience in setting up and managing consortia of all sizes. We are currently engaged with many client organizations working with EPA on a variety of TSCA issues under TSCA Sections 5, 6, and 8. And perhaps most importantly, BCCM’s unique business model gives our member company representatives exclusive access to Bergeson & Campbell’s (B&C®) deep bench of experts in the law, regulation, science, and policy of TSCA. B&C’s TSCA practice is the largest and most experienced in the country, and its partnership with BCCM makes it a compelling choice to select when considering forming a TSCA consortium.

BCCM, B&C, and Acta Overview

BCCM provides full-service management to more than a dozen separate industry groups with diverse regulatory, legal, and product stewardship interests. Each of these groups requires multi-disciplinary skills, as all companies engage in advocacy initiatives across geographic regions involving domestic and international stakeholders.

BCCM is unique in the services and talents it can offer its clients due to its affiliation with B&C, a Washington, D.C., law firm focusing on chemical control law, regulations, and business matters, and The Acta Group (Acta®), a global regulatory and scientific consulting firm.

BCCM can provide its client groups with immediate access to highly trained, sophisticated attorneys, non-lawyer professionals, and scientists with significant expertise in competition law compliance, regulatory law, data management, data compensation, supply-chain management, and regulatory, legal/policy, and guidance on contract development and related legal matters. The expansive talent pools at BCCM, B&C, and Acta allow for all-inclusive, comprehensive services in management, regulatory, and scientific efforts for a wide range of global chemical management systems and the business and legal issues these systems invite.

The B&C team offers unrivaled access to the premier TSCA practice group in the country. The B&C team includes five former senior EPA officials, an extensive non-lawyer scientific staff, including seven Ph.D.s, and a robust and highly experienced team of lawyers and non-lawyer professionals well versed in all aspects of TSCA law, regulation, policy, and litigation. B&C legal professionals are unparalleled in their understanding of the law and policy of TSCA.

BCCM Services

Regulatory Actions

With its management of several key chemical consortia, BCCM is among the elite management groups with direct, substantive, and ongoing experience working with EPA on TSCA Section 6 risk evaluations under new and old TSCA. Coupled with the B&C team of professionals, our combined professional strengths offer an unmatched powerhouse of TSCA experts. We believe this experience is invaluable and will prove essential in helping new groups navigate ongoing and future TSCA risk evaluation processes. BCCM also manages the TSCA New Chemicals Coalition, which has provided much-needed industry leadership with EPA on new chemical issues under amended TSCA.

BCCM can help ensure any new group’s success by providing the following services:

  • Serve as primary liaison with EPA for timely submissions, updates, and associated fee payments required under TSCA;
  • Maintain reporting and, if applicable, testing schedules;
  • Prepare regulatory submissions, including testing reports, if applicable;
  • Coordinate with EPA on any area of concern, potential delay, or other issue that might adversely impact deadlines and work to achieve appropriate relief;
  • Network and engage with other industry group(s) on areas of common interest;
  • Manage confidential information elicited for supply-chain related issues, including use and exposure information for downstream applications; and
  • Assist with development and execution of other strategic or regulatory action plans.

Administrative Services

BCCM’s key management objective is to protect and immunize each consortium’s interests from antitrust concerns, thereby allowing individual members to promote the consortium’s goals. BCCM staff has more than 30 years’ experience in managing and providing antitrust protection to various trade groups.

While antitrust protection is a primary focus, BCCM provides further administrative support services that are necessary for a consortium’s success, including:

  • Preparing and submitting relevant government paperwork to establish a consortium;
  • Managing the consortium registration in EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX);
  • Allowing the consortium to use BCCM offices as headquarter address and phone;
  • Managing all incoming mail/e-mail and telephone calls to the consortium;
  • Coordinating and arranging meetings and/or conference calls at the request of the Board, Work Group, and/or membership and providing antitrust counsel at each;
  • Developing and maintaining an e-mail list for internal communications;
  • Distributing and revising draft and final minutes for conference calls, web conferences, and meetings, in conjunction with Board members, usually within 48 hours; and
  • Leading membership recruitment, as approved by consortium Board and members.

Financial Management Support

BCCM offers financial management support that we believe is second to none. All BCCM consortia clients receive the benefit of our long-established accounting management services, which include the following services:

  • Assisting with development and execution of a cost-sharing mechanism for the consortium, based on years of experience for other consortia;
  • Executing programs for submission of prorated shares and/or supplemental fees to be paid by new members for expenses already incurred by existing consortium members;
  • Invoicing member companies for annual fees, disbursements, and other expenses;
  • Remitting payments to contract laboratories, consultants, or other service providers as approved by the membership under contractually agreed-upon conditions and schedules;
  • Maintaining consortium funds in a separate bank account, with all interest maintained in the consortium account;
  • Collecting member payments and processing accounts payable; and
  • Preparing tax filings in all relevant jurisdictions.

All BCCM financial and tax preparation materials are reviewed by a Certified Public Accountant (CPA).

Testing Management Services

If testing or research work is needed, either at EPA’s demand or based on the group’s product stewardship efforts, BCCM can provide the following services to support that effort:

  • Contracting and coordinating with technical experts as identified by members;
  • Identifying potential candidate contract facilities;
  • Placing and monitoring studies, including arrangements of site visits with members and/or consultants;
  • Negotiating and maintaining all testing agreements;
  • Assisting with protocol review, assessment for conformance with testing guidelines, analytical methodologies, and dose selection;
  • Coordinating with laboratory staff on deadlines and communications with members;
  • Conducting quality assurance audits to ensure that all regulatory and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) requirements are met;
  • Reviewing reports; and
  • Assisting with data compensation issues.

Forming an industry consortium to address TSCA issues -- present and future -- is a critical commercial move. Organizing an industry group means reduced cost, greater flexibility, increased time for strategic planning, and less aggravation in the long run. Finding the right management group for that group could be as important. We invite you to allow BCCM to prepare a consortium formation proposal for your company.

July 9, 2019
Strength in Numbers

May 9, 2019
Strength in Numbers:  Why Forming a TSCA Consortium Is Important

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released on March 20, 2019, a list of 20 chemicals that EPA has suggested as candidates for high priority designation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as reported in our March 22, 2019, memorandum "EPA Releases List of 40 Chemicals Undergoing Prioritization for Risk Evaluation."  Should those chemicals go forward as high priority, they will be subject to risk evaluation under TSCA Section 6.  Industry stakeholder responses to this candidate list proposal and follow up actions with EPA related to risk evaluation work optimally will be conducted under existing or potentially newly formed chemical consortia. 

But what if your chemical is not on the list of 20?  If you want to protect or even increase your business market advantage, consider inviting your commercial rivals to join an industry advocacy group anyway.  This is particularly important if you have a chemical of commercial interest on the TSCA Work Plan Chemicals list. 

In today’s regulatory environment, engaging in advocacy opportunities with your company’s competitors makes sense.  Consolidating experience, knowledge, and finances allows a company to achieve far more and faster than it could individually.  Given that amended TSCA requires EPA to look to the TSCA Work Plan Chemicals to identify chemicals for future prioritization consideration, we know those chemicals will be subject to regulatory scrutiny eventually.  So setting up and working under a consortium umbrella now makes sense.  Even if your chemical is not yet on the proverbial radar screen, there is benefit of organizing with others early.  Groups that wait to organize will deplete valuable limited time to form, leaving less time to engage effectively and comprehensively on EPA’s proposed actions.  Organizing industry groups now means reduced cost, greater flexibility, increased time for strategic planning, and less aggravation in the long run. 

Beyond prioritization and risk evaluation under Section 6, we also know that EPA anticipates industry group engagement for testing under TSCA Section 4.  Within the risk framework rulemakings, EPA expressed repeatedly and clearly that it anticipates TSCA obligations will be shared collaboratively and addressed by consortia groups.  Even within a general regulatory advocacy context, in many respects, EPA appropriately prefers working with industry coalitions to save time, obtain greater use and exposure information, and leverage more efficiently its own resources. 

Congress explicitly included the concepts of industry consortia as part of amended TSCA legislation under Section 4, as it relates to efforts to reduce animal testing, and Section 26, in anticipation of increased Agency fee payments.

So working under a consortium umbrella makes sense.  But before proceeding with group formation, there are some important factors to consider:

  • Antitrust Protection:  Members of an industry group must consider the need to protect against antitrust concerns.  It is reasonable to anticipate that outsiders may be concerned with key competitors working together.  It could be perceived as opportunities for dishonest companies to pursue unfair market activities, such as price fixing or monopolization efforts.  To address such concerns, industry consortia must be managed in a way that ensures federal antitrust laws are followed.  This can be achieved through a third-party management service, which provides administrative structure to the group, including specific meeting agendas and minutes, and competent antitrust counsel at meetings to ensure discussions or exchanges of prohibited information do not occur.
  • Regulatory Experience:  Today’s regulations are complex.  It is nearly impossible for today’s company representatives to have in-depth knowledge of the myriad of regulatory statutes impacting their commercial chemical products.  Having easy access to experts to assist the consortium in understanding the regulatory pressures for a specific chemical, as well as insight on strategic approaches, is invaluable. 
  • Financial Experience:  As organizations consider management service providers, they should appreciate that for many regulatory programs, the amount of money to collect and disburse is not insignificant.  Under TSCA Section 6, industry consortia will need to collect over $1,000,000 to cover anticipated EPA fees.  TSCA Section 4 requires fee payments of about $10,000 to $30,000 -- PLUS costs associated with the specific testing required.  Costs under the EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, while still in hibernation but potentially could progress soon, could be over $1,000,000.  A consortium should consider whether its management service provider has the ability to collect and disburse funds needed to cover required industry fees, contract testing, administrative management, and other costs associated with consortium work.  In some cases, there may be federal tax implications.  As such, it is recommended that consortium financial management be conducted under the auspices of a certified public accountant.
  • Sunset Provisions:  While details on the why, when, and how of setting up a new industry group is important, companies should also think about the parameters for shutting down the group when its work is completed.  A consortium should be maintained only if additional work is needed.  Otherwise, there should be an easy option for members to disband when the work is done. 

As mentioned, companies should be thinking ahead if chemical products important to them were not on the March 20 list.  The new normal is not what you think and going it alone is not smart.  The time to prepare for the future of your company’s products is now, and to do that, you will need to coordinate with others in your commercial space.

If you are interested in forming a new consortium, joining an existing B&C® Consortia Management, L.L.C. (BCCM) consortium (see partial list here:, or need more information on consortia benefits, contact BCCM Vice President Kathleen Roberts, or (202) 833-6581.

April 3, 2019
BCCM Consortia Work Reflected in ISO Standard

“Mighty oaks from little acorns grow” captures perfectly how the ideas from a small but passionate B&C® Consortia Management, L.L.C. (BCCM) group were transformed into an international standard. 

Almost a decade ago, in June 2011, a group of stakeholders involved with the production, assessment, and use of nanomaterials convened a workshop in California to share information on existing and emerging measurement strategies and to exchange ideas on expectations for the future.  Attendees at the workshop included the California Environmental Protection Agency, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, the California Air Resources Board, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, and the State Water Resources Control Board, each of which supported the need for additional information on the critical issue of measuring nanomaterials in the environment.  In response to this request, the initial group of stakeholders formed the Industry Consortium for the Environmental Measurement of Nanomaterials or ICEMN.

Over the course of several years, ICEMN members, which included representatives from industry, academia, and government groups, worked collectively and cooperatively to compile information that would address the challenge of environmental measurement of nanoscale materials and to enhance the state of the science in this regard.  In March 2013, a series of articles authored by ICEMN representatives was published in a special issue of Environmental Engineering Science, “Environmental Nanomaterials Reviews,” available at

The articles were written to be particularly useful for regulatory agencies, especially those at the state level, tasked with addressing the measurement of engineered nanomaterials in the environment.  The articles provided a practical guide for regulatory groups and other stakeholders interested in learning about the techniques and issues around nanomaterial measurement in water, air, and soil. 

Having achieved its purpose, following the publication of the papers, the ICEMN disbanded.  The seed that had been sown by ICEMN -- to educate on the state of the science on environmental measurement of nanomaterials -- slowly but steadily grew.  Interest on an international scale was cultivated and scientists from around the globe became engaged, resulting in the newly published International Standard Organization’s (ISO) “Nanotechnologies -- Considerations for the measurement of nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates (NOAA) in environmental matrices,” Technical Report 21386 (ISO/TR 21386:2019). 

Recognition must be given to Dr. Raymond David, former ICEMN Chair, for his time, passion, and years-long commitment to creating the ISO document and pursuing it through publication. We all owe Dr. David a debt of gratitude for his outstanding contribution to scholarship and stewarding the publication of this essential and groundbreaking achievement.

BCCM is proud of our group’s contribution to the creation of this global effort that will have a long-term and significant positive impact on the nanotechnology world.

November 9, 2018
BRAG: Call For Candidate Chemicals For Equivalency Determinations

Is your company engaged in Class 2 chemistries that are similar to existing Class 2 chemicals but are derived from an innovative bio-source? We are looking for pioneering companies working on new biobased Class 2 chemicals to assist in advancing an important project with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ISSUE:  While EPA sustainability goals would seemingly include adoption of improved biobased technologies, EPA’s policies under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) mean that many novel, sustainable technologies are considered “new chemicals” requiring EPA to conduct new chemical assessments.  If these new chemicals are converted to other substances by downstream customers, those substances are likely also new, requiring additional new chemical submissions and assessments.  Each new chemical submission and assessment represents a cost and a commercial delay and each is a barrier to adoption of what may be a promising sustainable technology.  These reviews can and do result in EPA applying risk management conditions on the production and distribution in commerce of the novel, renewable chemicals -- restrictions that may not apply to older chemistries even though they may be functionally identical in performance, hazard, and risk. Ironically, the new chemical may offer a more benign environmental footprint but nonetheless be subject to stricter controls.
POTENTIAL SOLUTION:  To address these issues, the Biobased and Renewable Products Advocacy Group (BRAG®) has submitted to EPA, in partnership with the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), a BRAG member, a White Paper proposing a TSCA Inventory representation and equivalency determinations for renewable and sustainable biobased chemicals. EPA’s initial response to the White Paper has been positive and staff has indicated a willingness to conduct equivalency determinations if submitted. 
REQUEST:  BRAG is now seeking companies interested in participating in a pilot project to prepare and submit such requests.  Specifically, we are looking for companies that manufacture or plan to manufacture a Class 2 chemical substance that is functionally equivalent to another Class 2 chemical, but due to existing naming conventions, the two chemicals are not listed as equivalent.  If your company fits this description and you wish to support an effort to alleviate commercial burden for yourself and others in the future, please consider working with BRAG on this important project so we present impactful equivalency cases to EPA.
BRAG and Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. (B&C®) are committed to this project.  As such, we will evaluate all candidate chemicals submitted, select what we believe is a good test case for the project, and prepare as a courtesy the necessary submission paperwork and equivalency arguments, in conjunction with the nominating company.
Please contact Ligia Duarte Botelho if your company is interested in submitting a nomination.

October 12, 2018
Fall 2018 Regulatory, Testing, and Policy Trends for Chemical Consortia

Now more than ever, chemical industry stakeholders with shared business and advocacy interests are urged to consider collaborating on regulatory, testing, and related advocacy opportunities. Two years post-passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is well underway with implementation of the amended Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).   
Industry groups that are already established and working efficiently when EPA initiates an action under TSCA will be most successful in nimbly and effectively engaging immediately.  Groups that have yet to organize will deplete valuable limited time to form, leaving little time to comment effectively and comprehensively on EPA’s proposed action.
TSCA is by far not the only game in town.  Companies should consider the benefits realized when organizing around advocacy and implementation effort pertinent to other regulatory initiatives such as Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) data call-ins (DCI), food and drug initiatives pursued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and a wide range of state-specific programs. 
This year’s B&C® Consortia Management, L.L.C. (BCCM) forecast highlights our groups’ interests and activities on these and other issues that can and should be addressed under a consortia canopy.  While we enjoy sharing our success stories, the goal of the forecast is to highlight the critical importance of leveraging resources by sharing the load through organizing groups of interested stakeholders, to summarize activities pertinent to our existing BCCM consortia, and to encourage you to consider allowing us to help with the formation of a new group to address issues of particular interest. 

Click here to open full PDF report

July 27, 2017
Summer 2017 Regulatory, Testing, and Policy Outlook for Chemical Consortia

This mid-year review of B&C® Consortia Management, L.L.C. (BCCM) activities highlights a wide range of advocacy, regulatory, science policy, testing, and communication activities and strategies in which our consortia groups are engaged. As you review the listed activities, we invite you to consider whether your organization would benefit from membership in an existing BCCM consortium, or in the formation of a new group to address issues of particular interest.

Click here to open full PDF report.


January 13, 2017
Issues Brought Up During BC-CM Producers Group Meeting Featured By Inside EPA Article

On January 13, 2017, slides from the B&C® Consortia Management’s (BC-CM) NMP Producers Group Meeting with the Office of Management and Budget were discussed in the Inside EPA article “Chemical Makers Cite TSCA Listing In Call For EPA To Drop NMP Proposal.”

[…] But representatives from Bergeson & Campbell on behalf of NMP producers in a Dec. 5 meeting with EPA and OMB officials ahead of the proposal's release argued that the rulemaking does not appear to be consistent with the completed risk assessment and therefore may violate section 26 under the updated law.
NMP is used as an intermediate or a solvent in electronics, agricultural chemical, pharmaceutical, coating, petrochemical processing, and industrial and consumer cleaner sectors. The agency later last June indicated to industry that a supplemental risk assessment for NMP showed potential risk to consumers, according to industry slides presented by Bergeson & Campbell at the Dec. 5 meeting. [subscription required]

March 8, 2016
B&C Consortia Management Spring 2016 Regulatory, Testing,  and Policy Outlook for Chemical Consortia

Click here for a PDF version of the memorandum.

The Business Wisdom of Consortia Advocacy

Engaging in advocacy opportunities with your company's competitor may seem counterintuitive in ultra-competitive times, but doing so as part of a consortium, in which your company benefits as well, makes sense. Working within a group to attain a shared goal offers benefits beyond cost savings. For example, the federal and international agencies prefer to work with coalitions to save time and leverage their resources; there is truth to the old adage, "There is strength in numbers." The beneficial outcome of competitors working together to elevate standards and business practices for the good of the whole is undeniable. Consolidating experience, knowledge, and finances allows consortium members to achieve far more and faster than they would individually.

The reasons for forming and maintaining a coalition are varied. There is great truth to the proverb, "Many hands make light work." As companies and related stakeholders consider the regulatory, policy, and stewardship challenges facing them today, they would be well-served to consider if it makes sense to tackle those challenges under a consortium umbrella. The likelihood is that an individual entity is not always well-suited to complete a costly testing program, influence policy change, or raise industry standards, but entities working together with a unified voice are.

In 2016, B&C® Consortia Management, L.L.C. (BCCM) will be leveraging its considerable resources on a wide range of advocacy, regulatory, science policy, testing, and communication activities for BCCM consortia members. BCCM is authorized to operate in the U.S. and Europe. We identify below specific initiatives, including group formation invited by regulatory actions, focused on needed policy changes or desires to improve worker safety. We invite stakeholders to consider whether they too should engage in any existing BCCM consortia, or to identify other testing or advocacy areas where consortia work makes sense.

Regulatory Triggers: Organize Now -- Before Final Action Is Taken

EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program

Producers and importers of chemicals included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) will be required to respond to test orders for their subject chemical(s). Given the high price tag of the EDSP test program, companies that continue to manufacture the listed chemicals will likely address the EDSP regulatory components within a consortium to share costs.

BCCM currently manages two groups focused on the EPA EDSP -- the N-Methylpyrrolidone Producers Group, Inc. (NMP Producers Group) and the MTBE Consortium -- and anticipates several more groups to organize in 2016. These groups appreciate that organizing efforts now -- before EPA formally issues EDSP test orders for their chemicals of interest -- is a smart strategic move. They have already begun the hard work of developing effective advocacy positions regarding testing needs and will be ready to engage immediately when EPA issues test orders.

Some companies may be concerned that forming or joining an EDSP consortium prior to the test order could result in an inequitable cost allocation. They fear that companies that choose not to join early will gain an advantage. This is incorrect. Under the EDSP, all companies that produce or import the subject chemical when the test order is issued must conduct the testing themselves, form or join a consortium that will conduct the testing, agree to provide fair and equitable reimbursement for testing conducted by others, or exit the market. Thus, there is no benefit to companies that choose not to proceed with a consortium. On the other hand, companies that opt to create or join an existing consortium will have the advantage of leading critical decisions on cost sharing, membership fees, and reimbursement provisions for late comers.

Through BCCM's affiliation with Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. (B&C®), its EDSP-focused groups have access to highly-experienced, sophisticated attorneys, scientists, and other non-legal professionals with significant expertise in regulatory law, science, data compensation, and EPA policy guidance. Test programs such as EDSP often present substantial risk information reporting questions, the answers to which experienced legal counsel may be needed. B&C is one of the few law firms in the country with a comprehensive domestic and international pesticide and industrial chemicals practice group.

BCCM is also an associate member of the Endocrine Policy Forum (EPF), a cooperative effort among EDSP stakeholders designed to facilitate communication, networking, and scientific dialogue on the testing program, interpretation of results, and guideline development.

While the EDSP test program does not mandate coordination prior to the issuance of test orders, sophisticated entities recognize that being a consortium member now allows adequate time comprehensively and thoughtfully to address administrative issues, agree upon cost sharing mechanisms, identify potential testing laboratories, retain experienced scientific consultants, and begin the important process of reviewing available data to support test waivers. These steps take time to do correctly, and waiting to form a consortium until EPA formally issues the test orders is unwise and disallows time to complete these tasks efficiently and effectively. Stakeholders need to be ready to engage in testing immediately, and will lack the necessary time to organize a group and secure limited testing capacity to fulfill the test orders.

TSCA Work Plan Chemicals

Updated in 2014, EPA maintains a list of 90 chemicals for assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Chemicals on this list will be subject to the TSCA Work Plan Chemical Assessment process that includes problem formulation, initial assessment, data needs assessment, final assessment, and potential risk management measures.

Of the currently completed assessments, BCCM groups engaged in two -- antimony trioxide (ATO) under the North American Metals Council (NAMC) and NMP under the NMP Producers Group. The ATO assessment concluded that no further work was necessary regarding the uses considered under the program. The NMP assessment concluded potential occupational risk for certain uses; the NMP Producers Group is actively engaged now with EPA on next steps. Several other BCCM groups have chemicals on the TSCA Work Plan list and will be well-positioned to engage when their chemical assessments are initiated.

Given concerns with the commercial impacts of an EPA assessment and possible use or application restrictions, companies with chemicals listed as TSCA Work Plan chemicals should be coordinating with other producers or importers now to be well-positioned to engage meaningfully in EPA's chemical assessment process. Similar to the EDSP work, entities should work together under the protection of a consortium structure before EPA initiates its Work Plan assessment. Preparatory actions by an organized group would include early advocacy with EPA regarding available hazard and exposure information, providing updates to EPA on any ongoing reviews or testing, and carefully reviewing existing data to identify potential gaps, particularly on use and exposure information.

Companies with commercial interests in Work Plan chemicals that delay action, based on the hope the program will go away, will be disappointed. It is well-recognized that the TSCA Work Plan Chemical Program is expected to be incorporated under TSCA reform legislation as the template for chemical prioritization for existing chemicals under a new TSCA framework.

FIFRA Activities

As part of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA must review each registered pesticide at least every 15 years to determine whether it continues to meet the FIFRA registration standard. EPA has implemented an aggressive schedule to complete needed assessments for pesticides registered as of October 2007. In addition to EPA, a number of state agencies focus significant regulatory attention on pesticide practices. Pesticides are increasingly a subject of interest from public interest groups, public health activists, and communities. These extended interests add further layers to the complexity of challenges faced by registrants and other agricultural stakeholders.

Companies manufacturing the same active ingredient are urged to collaborate under FIFRA to share testing costs and conserve resources. Beyond tests, and as noted, pesticide stakeholders are increasingly challenged to address policy issues that warrant a coordinated advocacy strategy to ensure success and leverage resources. Having a group of like-minded entities organized and accustomed to working together before EPA initiates resources to reregister an active ingredient could prove to be a critical factor for success. This allows for a coordinated voice to address EPA, pool much needed use-specific information of application practices and exposure scenarios, gather information on what data are already available, and assess how those data should be applied in EPA's consideration of any additional data generation requirements.

The BCCM Ethylene Oxide Task Force, Metam Task Force, and Methyl Isothiocyanate (MITC) Task Force are currently engaged in advocacy, communications, and data development to support the continued U.S. registration of their products. With assistance from B&C professionals, BCCM groups are able efficiently to meet data production requirements, and obtain data compensation from appropriate others.

IRIS Reviews

Companies with chemicals subject to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment should be prepared to engage efficiently with EPA given that final IRIS hazard values are widely relied on by EPA program offices as well as state and local health agencies, other federal agencies, and international health organizations. Like other EPA programs, coordinated group advocacy is essential and the results of such action will carry more weight and garner more attention than individual entity input.

The IRIS process, which is managed by EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), involves multiple phases. While stakeholders have several opportunities to engage with EPA, it is crucial that advocacy and cooperation among stakeholders begin early. The IRIS assessment itself represents the first part of the risk assessment process and can take many years to complete.

Within BCCM, several groups are actively engaged in or carefully monitoring the IRIS program, including the Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Association, Inc. (EOSA) and NAMC. The groups actively engage EPA through participation in public meetings and preparation of comments for consideration by EPA and its Science Advisory Board (SAB). When a substance is undergoing IRIS assessment, it is critical to conduct independent technical reviews of data and modeling. Existing consortia are able to complete these tasks swiftly and efficiently through the retention of expert consultants. Costs to individual entities are greatly reduced when this type of leveraged advocacy is performed by a consortium.

Policy Changes: Working Together for the Common Good

Recognizing problems within the current regulatory framework is easy; trying to resolve those problems can be difficult. Unless an entity wishes to spend a great deal of time and money, going it alone is not the best or only way to effectuate change and solve problems. By coordinating with other like-minded entities, flawed policies or misguided rules can be addressed leveraging the additional resources, coordinated advocacy, and strength offered by a consortium.

Several BCCM groups were formed specifically to address policy-related issues. The Alliance for Chemical Nomenclature (AChN) brings together companies and organizations engaged in the manufacture and/or use of fractionated chemical substances or other unknown, variable, complex, or biological substances, or otherwise have a vested interest in the commercial availability and regulatory TSCA classifications of such substances. AChN ensures its members' rights are adequately represented before EPA regarding the consequences of evolving, and often flawed, re-interpretations of TSCA nomenclature conventions that have significant commercial and enforcement consequences on AChN member companies. We need look no further than the current debacle involving EPA's medium and long chain chlorinated paraffins to appreciate the consequential legal, policy, and commercial implications of EPA's unlawful and misguided decision to interpret existing chemicals listed on the TSCA Inventory as "new" despite their robust commercial presence over the past 50 years in U.S. commerce.

The Industry Consortium for Environmental Measurement of Nanomaterials (ICEMN) was a consortium of industry, academic, and government stakeholders that recognized policy makers were not well-versed in available information on measuring nanomaterials in the environment. That group organized a highly successful workshop with the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and followed up with a series of articles about nanomaterial measurement in water, air, and soil that now serves as a practical guide for state and federal regulatory agencies.

Other BCCM groups working on important policy issues include the Biobased and Renewable Products Advocacy Group (BRAG®), NAMC, and the Titanium Dioxide Stewardship Council (TDSC).

BRAG members have long recognized that regulatory barriers exist for biobased chemistries and have coordinated efforts to address these regulatory hindrances and commercial inequities. BRAG has successfully advocated for reduced federal reporting requirements under the TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) that provides biodiesel manufacturers the same diminished reporting opportunities afforded petroleum-based diesel manufacturers -- saving the industry significant time, energy, and resources. In 2016, BRAG will continue to advocate policy changes related to naming differences for new biobased chemicals and their derivatives, even though those new chemicals are substantially similar in terms of functionality and chemical structure to older chemicals.

NAMC will continue its advocacy drum beat with EPA, Congress, state, and international organizations that metals have special attributes and behaviors that must be uniquely considered when assessing human health and ecological risks. The unique attributes are highlighted in the "Framework for Metals Risk Assessment," a science-based document that NAMC members worked closely with EPA in developing, and continue to emphasize as persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT) issues continue to be the subject of extraordinary government attention.

TDSC has and will continue to be actively engaged in proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements impacting nanoscale materials. "Nano" issues extend far beyond the titanium dioxide (TiO2) industry and TDSC is one of many consortia that have engaged EPA on the issue. While these requirements impact many industries, TDSC members understood early on that the "strength in numbers" approach can extend beyond a particular industry segment. By working with other organizations, TDSC members see the benefit of working not only with competing companies, but with other industries, to advocate for a shared goal.

Product Stewardship: Collaboration Results in Improved Safety

While regulatory requirements are often a catalyst for companies to form an industry group, there are a growing number of "soft" non-regulatory factors that jump-start group formation. Industry leaders are often in the best position to execute needed changes within their sectors, which includes recognizing the need to promote important product stewardship activities related to research, worker safety, and/or communication needs across the value chain.

The BCCM Tetrahydrofuran Task Force (THF) has been deeply involved with voluntary research to understand better the mechanism of action related to certain hazard endpoints associated with THF. The Task Force appreciates that such proactive research can diminish areas of scientific uncertainty that would otherwise result in the application of uncertainty factors in regulatory contexts.

Recognizing the critical importance of an informed worker population, the Hydrogen Sulfide Coalition (H2S Coalition) is engaged in a unique program with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to develop educational and training materials covering the issues uniquely associated with H2S, including confined space, transportation, and handling issues spanning nearly 100 occupations across various industries. The H2S Coalition is able to address these concerns as it is a consortium consisting of multiple industry associations, each with their own member companies that collectively share an interest in H2S matters. This type of organization provides immense technical resources and expertise among the membership. Furthermore, it creates efficiency as multiple organizations are able to leverage time, resources, and costs required to address concerns.

One of BCCM's newer groups is the Aseptic and Antimicrobial Processing and Packaging Association. It is focused on the goal of enhancing industry practices to promote worker safety and protection. It is engaging food and beverage producers, processors, packaging suppliers, equipment manufacturers, and other stakeholders to enhance best practices for worker protection, spill clean-up, and other safety areas.

BCCM Services to Support All Consortia Goals

While the reasons for forming a consortium are varied, the objectives are the same -- to work together in a cost-effective manner in support of a common goal. BCCM can provide the necessary infrastructure, framework, and support to ensure that those goals are met quickly and efficiently.

BCCM creates and manages business consortia that have evolved in response to targeted advocacy, research, required product testing for entities in the industrial, agricultural, specialty chemical, or product/article area, or product stewardship interests. An industry group organized under BCCM allows for maximized impact because participants can leverage resources to address issues critically important to their needs and essential to their continued success.

All BCCM consortia work toward consensus decisions on issues related to membership dues, cost sharing for specific research programs, consideration of communication approaches, decisions on selection of testing laboratories, and advocacy strategies. BCCM recognizes that alignment among consortia members is essential for success and BCCM groups strive to achieve consensus decisions among members under the skilled, diplomatic, and experienced direction of BCCM staff. An important part of the decision-making process is the availability of carefully crafted and comprehensive bylaws that clearly identify the individual consortium's goals, objectives, work practices, and membership expectations. BCCM managers are sophisticated and experienced in the development and implementation of such bylaws as part of their day-to-day consortium management.

BCCM is unique in the services and talents it can offer its clients due to its affiliation with B&C, a Washington, D.C. law firm focusing on environmental and chemical control regulations, and The Acta Group (Acta®), a global regulatory and scientific consulting provider headquartered in Washington, D.C., with offices in Manchester, UK, and China.

BCCM is a core part of the B&C law firm's business platform to service clients efficiently. B&C has an international reputation for providing high-quality, cutting edge legal and regulatory counsel to Fortune 100 companies; medium size manufacturers; and trade associations and start-ups commercializing innovative, emerging technologies, including nanotechnology, biotechnology, and synthetic biology. B&C authored the report, "The DNA of the U.S. Regulatory System: Are We Getting It Right For Synthetic Biology?" B&C has been consistently ranked among the highest, most qualified firms by providing unfailing, spot-on legal advice, strategic counseling, and business acumen. Additional information is available at

BCCM is also affiliated with Acta, an international consulting firm that offers a broad range of regulatory and scientific consulting services to entities worldwide. Acta focuses on chemical and other heavily regulated product approval issues and the supply chain notification, customer demand, communication, media attention, and regulatory issues associated with these regulatory requirements. Acta has been a consistent player in all matters under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) legislation for over a decade, and is very much engaged in notifications and supply chain matters in China, Korea, Turkey, and elsewhere. More information on Acta is available at

Given its affiliation with B&C and Acta, BCCM can provide its groups with immediate access to highly-trained, sophisticated attorneys, non-lawyer professionals, and scientists with significant expertise in competition law compliance, global chemical law and regulation, data management, data compensation, supply chain management, and regulatory and legal/policy guidance. The expansive talent pools at BCCM, B&C, and Acta allow for all-inclusive, comprehensive services in management, regulatory, and scientific efforts for a wide range of global chemical management systems and the business and legal issues these systems invite. Our team is deeply experienced in multiple scientific arenas, including food regulations, pesticides, risk assessment, computer modeling, chemical control efforts, nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and biofuels/biochemicals. Access to this pool of talent has proven to be an essential element in the success of BCCM's groups.

Administrative Services

BCCM's key management objective is to protect and immunize each consortium's interests from antitrust concerns, thereby allowing individual members to promote the consortium's goals. BCCM staff has more than 30 years of experience in managing and providing antitrust protection to various trade groups.

While antitrust protection is an important focus, BCCM provides comprehensive administrative, accounting, and communication support services that are necessary for a consortium's success, including coordination of all meetings/conference calls; maintenance of e-mail lists; collection and maintenance of confidential production or market share information for cost allocation purposes; providing for the amalgamation and protection of competitively sensitive information; membership recruitment; and website design and maintenance.

Regulatory Advocacy

BCCM's goal is to ensure each consortium's voice is heard on regulatory, scientific, legal, and related advocacy issues of interest to consortium members. BCCM often serves as the consortium's liaison with pertinent domestic and international regulatory agencies central to the consortium's issues. BCCM addresses regulatory advocacy needs for its clients, such as updating membership on significant regulatory, scientific, and legal issues relevant to the consortium's issues; engaging with regulatory groups to identify opportunities for coordination; networking with other groups on common areas of interest; preparing regulatory comments; and building and maintaining positive relationships with key state, federal, or international agencies/organizations, such as the EPA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Congress, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and related entities.

Round-Robin Testing

BCCM has developed and executed round-robin analysis of consortia members' products in response to regulatory agency requests. These projects included obtaining and recording members' samples, blending those samples, coordinating with third parties for sample analysis, and developing final reports that provided relevant information while maintaining confidential business information. BCCM staff has also coordinated with B&C attorneys in the compilation and submission of market data to various agencies to demonstrate potential commercial impacts of proposed government actions.

In activities related to collection of sensitive business data, BCCM utilizes the B&C law firm's standard operating procedures (SOP) for protection of client records and information that specify locked files and disposal via shredding. BCCM staff engages B&C legal counsel in assessing, designing, and implementing identified data collection exercises to ensure they are compliant with all antitrust and competition sensitivities. In coordination with B&C attorneys, or a group's outside legal counsel and consortium representatives, BCCM staff works to identify the goal of the collection exercise, as well as the cohorts and timeframes, and assists in the preparation of surveys or other collection mechanisms. When information is submitted, BCCM staff follows established protocols and procedures on how to maintain the information, and engage in data analysis and aggregation suitable for public advocacy needs.

Research/Testing Programs

For groups wishing to engage in research or regulatory testing programs, BCCM can provide services associated with preparation of requests for proposals; negotiation of contracts with laboratories/testing facilities; provision of scientific counsel on test protocols and draft reports; regulatory and/or legal counsel on reporting obligations; and coordination and monitoring of testing activities, including updates to membership on key milestones and reporting obligations.

Often times, a consortium may undertake a research/testing program in response to regulatory requirements. Some consortia, however, elect to develop a voluntary research program. This may be done in support of product stewardship goals or to "get a jump" ahead of an anticipated, but not yet implemented, regulatory requirement. Such voluntary work can at times help guide a regulatory agency as it considers data that are important to its goal.

"Research work" is not completed simply because a final study report has been issued. BCCM also works with consortium members to manage the archival of important study materials to ensure all regulatory requirements are satisfied.


Many BCCM consortia engage in various public communication activities, ranging from developing and maintaining websites to creating a vibrant social media presence, to preparing press releases. As requested by the individual consortium, BCCM can provide membership updates on issues of concern; lists of chemical lists, summarizing all federal, state, and international lists on which chemicals of interest are included; alerts to consortium members of relevant industry/government developments; design and maintenance of public and private websites; development of professional brochures, advertising, promotional, and other informational materials (i.e., position statements, best practice guides); and development of product defense strategies, including draft press releases and related documents, formulated responses to media and other inquiries, and prepared question and answer documents.

In some instances, a consortium may wish to develop a communications program to respond to a significant advocacy need. In these cases, BCCM relies on past experiences with specialized communications firms to identify the most appropriate consultant to address the needs of the consortium. BCCM works with these firms to obtain focused and cost-effective proposals for the consortium members to review. Once a communications firm is selected, BCCM works to ensure all interests identified and public communication and outreach are managed effectively to leverage the group's investment in issue management and public outreach.

Financial Management Support

An often overlooked but critical service for industry groups is financial management. BCCM offers comprehensive and timely financial management support, which we believe is second to none. BCCM provides its consortia clients with a full line of accounting services, including preparing tax filings in all relevant jurisdictions; preparing financial statements; assisting with budgeting; invoicing member companies for annual fees, disbursements, and other expenses; remitting payments to contract laboratories, consultants, or other service providers as approved by the membership under contractually agreed upon conditions and schedules; maintaining consortium funds in a separate bank account; and collecting member payments and processing accounts payable.

All BCCM financial and tax preparation materials are prepared by a Certified Public Accountant (CPA).


BCCM groups enjoy the very latest in communication, meeting, and file management technology. Conferencing features are state of the art and include services ranging from basic audio teleconferences allowing for the participation of international callers to web-based meetings and video conferences. SharePoint sites are available and can be established to manage the development of complex documents requiring group input and review. When desired, websites are created quickly and managed efficiently using the latest software tools and resources. List serves are created and managed to optimize work flow and enhance communications with consortium members.

Mission Focused

BCCM management recognizes concerns with the "Hotel California" phenomena often associated with consortia groups. Once a group is formed, it often remains in existence, whether it is actively engaged in work, or not. That is not BCCM's philosophy. Our management approach is and always has been that a consortium should sunset when its goals are achieved. While some BCCM groups have long-term goals that may take years to achieve, others have very specific, very narrow program goals to achieve and will disband following that work. These groups have a beginning, a middle, and an end.

Examples of BCCM consortia that have sunset include the California Nano Industry Network (CalNIN) and the ICEMN. While these consortia sunset upon achieving their goals, the networks and relationships remain in place and could easily be reactivated should an issue arise in the future for which the industry wishes or needs to collaborate.


March 27, 2015
Interest in West Coast Sustainable Futures Training

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. (B&C®) and its affiliate organizations are investigating the possibility of hosting a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Sustainable Futures workshop on the West Coast in late 2015. As you may know, Sustainable Futures training focuses on a variety of tools, methods, and models that can be used to assess the hazard and potential exposure of chemicals. The intensive, hands-on training provided at Sustainable Futures workshops allows attendees to utilize the EPA methods of hazard and risk screening for human health, ecotoxicity, and environmental fate, and learn directly from EPA professionals how best to apply these tools. Benefits for companies that engage in Sustainable Futures training include an option to manufacture sooner, and perhaps more important, the ability to reduce regulatory uncertainty for its new chemicals prior to EPA submission. Sustainable Futures participants are better positioned to anticipate and either avoid or control better hazardous conditions related to their chemicals of concern.

As part of our investigative process, we are asking our clients to weigh in on their interest for such a workshop on the West Coast -- recognizing the workshop involves three days of training by EPA staff at an anticipated cost of $1,500. Your response to this informal survey does not obligate you in any way, but would be extremely helpful to us as we contemplate whether to proceed with this EPA partnership.

Thank you in advance for your simple reply of either -- "Yes, I am interested" or "No, I am not interested." Replies should be sent to Kathleen M. Roberts at

 1 2 > 


2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 100W
Washington, D.C. 20037
202-833-6580 |
Contact • Twitter
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Policy 
©2020 B&C Consortia Management, L.L.C.
All Rights Reserved.